[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dist-obj] CORBA implementation ideas
Mark Thomsen wrote:
>Actually many of the problems are dealt with in Active's technology. For
>example, distributed memory management. One program has data. Sends data
>as message. Assuming a persistent queue, you can delete the data as soon as
>the call to pass is accepted. No more coordination than that. And no
>coordination with the receiver.
>Further, there could be multiple receivers ... say a full publish and
>subscribe cycle. Program A publishes data. When can it delete? Right
>away. Other programs that subscribe can get data at their leisure.
Do I understand correctly that this was more of an asynchronous
message-passing architecture than a ORB-remote procedure call
To unsubscribe and other requests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archives, FAQ, etc. http://www.distributedcoalition.org/mailing_lists/